integrated development environment (ide) build 547 Search Results


94
ATCC analyte strain source flu a h3 aichi
Analyte Strain Source Flu A H3 Aichi, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/analyte strain source flu a h3 aichi/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
analyte strain source flu a h3 aichi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec pdgfrα antibody coated microbeads
Pdgfrα Antibody Coated Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pdgfrα antibody coated microbeads/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pdgfrα antibody coated microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
NanoTemper Technologies nt-547 dye
Nt 547 Dye, supplied by NanoTemper Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nt-547 dye/product/NanoTemper Technologies
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nt-547 dye - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
DSMZ 2 4 d degrader cupriavidus necator jmp134 strain
2 4 D Degrader Cupriavidus Necator Jmp134 Strain, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2 4 d degrader cupriavidus necator jmp134 strain/product/DSMZ
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2 4 d degrader cupriavidus necator jmp134 strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Jackson Immuno anti immunoglobulin donkey f ab 2 fragments
Anti Immunoglobulin Donkey F Ab 2 Fragments, supplied by Jackson Immuno, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti immunoglobulin donkey f ab 2 fragments/product/Jackson Immuno
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti immunoglobulin donkey f ab 2 fragments - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher dionextm ionpac as11-hc anion-exchange column
Dionextm Ionpac As11 Hc Anion Exchange Column, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dionextm ionpac as11-hc anion-exchange column/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dionextm ionpac as11-hc anion-exchange column - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
DSMZ skm1 cell line
Figure 1. Synergistic antineoplastic effects of azacytidine and erlotinib against <t>SKM1</t> cells. SKM1 cells were cultured in control conditions (DMSO) or in the presence of the indicated concentrations of azacytidine (AZA) and erlotinib (ERLO), alone or in combination, for (a) 24 h or (b) 48 h, and then assessed for viability by a colorimetric MTS conversion assay. The reduction in MTS conversion is depicted on a 0 (control conditions) to 1 (no conversion) scale. Results are means of duplicate assessments from one out of three independent experiments. (c) In addition, the dose–response curve of each drug was determined and combination index (CI) values for varying AZA/ERLO concentration ratios (4:1, 1:1 and 1:4) were calculated according to the Chou–Talalay’s method at the 24 h time point, with the biological response being expressed as the fraction of affected cells. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals of each condition. The fraction of affected cells for which the combination of AZA and ERLO at the indicated ratio begins to exert synergistic effects is indicated.
Skm1 Cell Line, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/skm1 cell line/product/DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
skm1 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
Jackson Immuno alexa488 against goat
B cells were harvested from the spleen of an Exosc10COIN/LacZ mouse and fixed and prepared for 3D-STORM after 72 hrs of treatment with (1) stimulation cocktail and (2) 4OHT+stimulation cocktail. Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-Aresolution) image from a data set of 50,000 frames with Atto488 labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus. Three dimensional views of the boxed region show spatial distribution of AID and Mtr4 molecules inside the nuclei of B cells isolated from (A) wild type cells and (D) Exosc10 knockout cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in the B cell nucleus of (B) wild type & (E) Exosc10 knockout cells and in the corresponding cytoplasms (C) & (F), by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (G) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nucleus versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 were calculated in the cytoplasm versus nucleus of (H) wild type & (I) Exosc10 knockout B cells using a Student’s t-test in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software and P values are noted in the graph. (J) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nuclear center versus displaced from center versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (K) Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-resolution) image with <t>Alexa488</t> labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus of wild type Exosc10 cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in (L) nucleus center and (M) displaced from center of wild type cells, by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. All of the 3D STORM imaging was performed in three different B cells (from independent experiments) and repeated three or more times. 3D STORM super resolution image magnification is ×100. Scale bar: 1μm(K). Error bars indicate S.D. (P values: ** <0.01, *** <0.001)
Alexa488 Against Goat, supplied by Jackson Immuno, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/alexa488 against goat/product/Jackson Immuno
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alexa488 against goat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH goat fab anti-mouse igg (h+l)-alexa fluor 488
rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.
Goat Fab Anti Mouse Igg (H+L) Alexa Fluor 488, supplied by Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/goat fab anti-mouse igg (h+l)-alexa fluor 488/product/Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat fab anti-mouse igg (h+l)-alexa fluor 488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher dylightt 547 fluor
rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.
Dylightt 547 Fluor, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dylightt 547 fluor/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dylightt 547 fluor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sage Therapeutics sage-547 (allopregnanolone
rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.
Sage 547 (Allopregnanolone, supplied by Sage Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sage-547 (allopregnanolone/product/Sage Therapeutics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sage-547 (allopregnanolone - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad rapid salmonella agar
rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.
Rapid Salmonella Agar, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rapid salmonella agar/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rapid salmonella agar - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 1. Synergistic antineoplastic effects of azacytidine and erlotinib against SKM1 cells. SKM1 cells were cultured in control conditions (DMSO) or in the presence of the indicated concentrations of azacytidine (AZA) and erlotinib (ERLO), alone or in combination, for (a) 24 h or (b) 48 h, and then assessed for viability by a colorimetric MTS conversion assay. The reduction in MTS conversion is depicted on a 0 (control conditions) to 1 (no conversion) scale. Results are means of duplicate assessments from one out of three independent experiments. (c) In addition, the dose–response curve of each drug was determined and combination index (CI) values for varying AZA/ERLO concentration ratios (4:1, 1:1 and 1:4) were calculated according to the Chou–Talalay’s method at the 24 h time point, with the biological response being expressed as the fraction of affected cells. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals of each condition. The fraction of affected cells for which the combination of AZA and ERLO at the indicated ratio begins to exert synergistic effects is indicated.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Synergistic antineoplastic effects of azacytidine and erlotinib against SKM1 cells. SKM1 cells were cultured in control conditions (DMSO) or in the presence of the indicated concentrations of azacytidine (AZA) and erlotinib (ERLO), alone or in combination, for (a) 24 h or (b) 48 h, and then assessed for viability by a colorimetric MTS conversion assay. The reduction in MTS conversion is depicted on a 0 (control conditions) to 1 (no conversion) scale. Results are means of duplicate assessments from one out of three independent experiments. (c) In addition, the dose–response curve of each drug was determined and combination index (CI) values for varying AZA/ERLO concentration ratios (4:1, 1:1 and 1:4) were calculated according to the Chou–Talalay’s method at the 24 h time point, with the biological response being expressed as the fraction of affected cells. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals of each condition. The fraction of affected cells for which the combination of AZA and ERLO at the indicated ratio begins to exert synergistic effects is indicated.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Cell Culture, Control, Concentration Assay

Figure 2. Synergistic killing of leukemic cells by azacytidine plus erlotinib. The indicated cell lines (all originally established from MDS or AML patients) were maintained in control conditions (DMSO) or treated for 72 h with 1 mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 1 mM decitabine (DEC, D), 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 10 mM gefitinib (GEFI), 0.5 mM sunitinib (SUNI), 0.5 mM dasatinib (DASA), 1 mM sorafenib (SORA), 5 mM imatinib (IMA) and 5 mM lapatinib (LAPA), alone or combined as indicated, followed by cytofluorometry for the assessment of apoptosis-associated variables upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. (a) Representative dot plots of SKM1 cells (numbers indicate the percentage of cells found in each quadrant). (b, c) Black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PI þ) and dying (PI DiOC6(3)low) cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). *Po0.05, **Po0.01, ***Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with DMSO-treated cells; #Po0.05, ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with AZA-treated cells; wwPo0.01, wwwPo0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with (b) ERLO-treated or (c) tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated cells.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Synergistic killing of leukemic cells by azacytidine plus erlotinib. The indicated cell lines (all originally established from MDS or AML patients) were maintained in control conditions (DMSO) or treated for 72 h with 1 mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 1 mM decitabine (DEC, D), 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 10 mM gefitinib (GEFI), 0.5 mM sunitinib (SUNI), 0.5 mM dasatinib (DASA), 1 mM sorafenib (SORA), 5 mM imatinib (IMA) and 5 mM lapatinib (LAPA), alone or combined as indicated, followed by cytofluorometry for the assessment of apoptosis-associated variables upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. (a) Representative dot plots of SKM1 cells (numbers indicate the percentage of cells found in each quadrant). (b, c) Black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PI þ) and dying (PI DiOC6(3)low) cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). *Po0.05, **Po0.01, ***Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with DMSO-treated cells; #Po0.05, ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with AZA-treated cells; wwPo0.01, wwwPo0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) compared with (b) ERLO-treated or (c) tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated cells.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Control, Staining

Figure 3. Biochemical and morphological hallmarks of apoptosis in SKM1 cells succumbing to azacytidine plus erlotinib. SKM1 cells were maintained in control conditions (DMSO) for 24 h or exposed, for the same time, to 1mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 10mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 50mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), 5mM HA14-1, 0.5mM ABT-263 and 0.1mM obatoclax (Oba), alone or in the indicated combinations. Thereafter, cells were either processed for the immunoblotting-assisted detection of (a) caspase-3 (CASP-3) maturation, (b) PARP cleavage, and (h) the abundance of multiple Bcl-2 family members, either subjected to immunofluorescence microcopy for the visualization of (c, d) cytochrome c (Cyt c) subcellular localization and (c, e) nuclei or (f, g, i) analyzed by cytofluorometry upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. Representative immunoblots are shown in a, b and h. b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes. Quantitative data for relevant proteins are reported in Supplementary Figure S1. In c, representative immunofluorescence microphotographs are shown (bars¼ 2.5 or 10 mm, as indicated), while quantitative data (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) on nuclear karyorrhexis and Cyt c release are illustrated in d and e, respectively. Panel f depicts representative dot plots (numbers indicate the percentage of cells found in each quadrant). In g and i, black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PIþ) and dying (PIDiOC6(3)low) and cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ***Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with A þ E-treated cells in the absence of Z-VAD (d, e and g); ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with AZA-treated cells (i); wwPo0.01, wwwPo0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with ERLO-treated cells (i).

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Biochemical and morphological hallmarks of apoptosis in SKM1 cells succumbing to azacytidine plus erlotinib. SKM1 cells were maintained in control conditions (DMSO) for 24 h or exposed, for the same time, to 1mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 10mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 50mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), 5mM HA14-1, 0.5mM ABT-263 and 0.1mM obatoclax (Oba), alone or in the indicated combinations. Thereafter, cells were either processed for the immunoblotting-assisted detection of (a) caspase-3 (CASP-3) maturation, (b) PARP cleavage, and (h) the abundance of multiple Bcl-2 family members, either subjected to immunofluorescence microcopy for the visualization of (c, d) cytochrome c (Cyt c) subcellular localization and (c, e) nuclei or (f, g, i) analyzed by cytofluorometry upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. Representative immunoblots are shown in a, b and h. b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes. Quantitative data for relevant proteins are reported in Supplementary Figure S1. In c, representative immunofluorescence microphotographs are shown (bars¼ 2.5 or 10 mm, as indicated), while quantitative data (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) on nuclear karyorrhexis and Cyt c release are illustrated in d and e, respectively. Panel f depicts representative dot plots (numbers indicate the percentage of cells found in each quadrant). In g and i, black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PIþ) and dying (PIDiOC6(3)low) and cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ***Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with A þ E-treated cells in the absence of Z-VAD (d, e and g); ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with AZA-treated cells (i); wwPo0.01, wwwPo0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with ERLO-treated cells (i).

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Control, Western Blot, Staining

Figure 4. DNA damage foci induced by the combination of azacytidine and erlotinib. SKM1 cells were cultured for 24 h in control conditions (DMSO) or in the presence of 1 mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 50 mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), alone or combined. Thereafter, cells were processed for the immunofluorescence microscopy-assisted quantification of the levels (none, low, intermediate or high) of nuclear gH2AX þ and 53BP1 þ foci. (a) Representative microphotographs are shown (bar ¼ 5 mm); (b) quantitative data are reported (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). Alternatively, the intensity of H2AX phosphorylation was determined (d, e) by cytofluorometry upon staining with a gH2AX-specific antibody or (f) by immunoblotting. Results from one representative experiments out of three are reported in d and f (b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes), while quantitative cytofluorometric data, upon normalization to control conditions, are illustrated in e (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). *Po0.05, **Po0.01 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with DMSO-treated cells; #Po0.05 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; ns ¼ non-significant (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with cells treated with the same chemicals in the absence of Z-VAD. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. DNA damage foci induced by the combination of azacytidine and erlotinib. SKM1 cells were cultured for 24 h in control conditions (DMSO) or in the presence of 1 mM azacytidine (AZA, A), 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), 50 mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), alone or combined. Thereafter, cells were processed for the immunofluorescence microscopy-assisted quantification of the levels (none, low, intermediate or high) of nuclear gH2AX þ and 53BP1 þ foci. (a) Representative microphotographs are shown (bar ¼ 5 mm); (b) quantitative data are reported (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). Alternatively, the intensity of H2AX phosphorylation was determined (d, e) by cytofluorometry upon staining with a gH2AX-specific antibody or (f) by immunoblotting. Results from one representative experiments out of three are reported in d and f (b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes), while quantitative cytofluorometric data, upon normalization to control conditions, are illustrated in e (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). *Po0.05, **Po0.01 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with DMSO-treated cells; #Po0.05 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; ns ¼ non-significant (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with cells treated with the same chemicals in the absence of Z-VAD. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Cell Culture, Control, Microscopy, Phospho-proteomics, Staining, Western Blot

Figure 5. Effects of azacytidine and erlotinib on differentiation and cell-cycle progression. (a) SKM1 cells were maintained for 72 h in control conditions (DMSO) or exposed, for the same time, to 0.5 mM azacytidine (AZA, A) and 5 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), alone or in combination, and then processed for May-Gru¨nwald–Giemsa staining. Representative cytological images are illustrated (bar ¼ 5 mm). Alternatively, SKM1 cells were kept in control conditions (DMSO) or treated with 1 mM AZA, 10 mM ERLO and 50 mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), alone or in combination, for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were either (b) processed for the immunoblotting-assisted detection of p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 levels, or subjected to cytofluorometric determinations of (c, d) the cell-cycle distribution and (e, f) of the percentage of cells exhibiting active DNA synthesis. Results from one representative experiment out of three are reported in b (b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes), c (numbers indicate the percentage of cells with a hypodiploid DNA content) and e (numbers indicate the percentage of cells incorporating 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU)). Quantitative data (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) are reported in d and f. ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; wwwPo0.001, ns ¼ non-significant (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with ERLO-treated cells.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Effects of azacytidine and erlotinib on differentiation and cell-cycle progression. (a) SKM1 cells were maintained for 72 h in control conditions (DMSO) or exposed, for the same time, to 0.5 mM azacytidine (AZA, A) and 5 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), alone or in combination, and then processed for May-Gru¨nwald–Giemsa staining. Representative cytological images are illustrated (bar ¼ 5 mm). Alternatively, SKM1 cells were kept in control conditions (DMSO) or treated with 1 mM AZA, 10 mM ERLO and 50 mM Z-VAD-fmk (Z-VAD), alone or in combination, for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were either (b) processed for the immunoblotting-assisted detection of p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 levels, or subjected to cytofluorometric determinations of (c, d) the cell-cycle distribution and (e, f) of the percentage of cells exhibiting active DNA synthesis. Results from one representative experiment out of three are reported in b (b actin levels were monitored to ensure equal loading of lanes), c (numbers indicate the percentage of cells with a hypodiploid DNA content) and e (numbers indicate the percentage of cells incorporating 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU)). Quantitative data (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) are reported in d and f. ##Po0.01, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; wwwPo0.001, ns ¼ non-significant (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with ERLO-treated cells.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Control, Staining, Western Blot, DNA Synthesis

Figure 6. Impact of azacytidine and erlotinib on the number and size of colonies formed by SKM1 cells. SKM1 cells were seeded in a methylcellulose-based medium containing DMSO (control condition), 0.15 mM azacytidine (AZA, A) or 2.5 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), alone or in combination, and allowed to generate colonies for 14 days. At the end of the assay, the number and volume of colonies were quantified. (a) Representative plates and colonies (phase contrast microscopy) are shown (bars ¼ 200 mm or 1 cm, as indicated). (b, c) Quantitative data upon normalization to control conditions (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) on colony number and volume are reported. ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; wPo0.05, wwPo0.01 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with ERLO-treated cells.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Impact of azacytidine and erlotinib on the number and size of colonies formed by SKM1 cells. SKM1 cells were seeded in a methylcellulose-based medium containing DMSO (control condition), 0.15 mM azacytidine (AZA, A) or 2.5 mM erlotinib (ERLO, E), alone or in combination, and allowed to generate colonies for 14 days. At the end of the assay, the number and volume of colonies were quantified. (a) Representative plates and colonies (phase contrast microscopy) are shown (bars ¼ 200 mm or 1 cm, as indicated). (b, c) Quantitative data upon normalization to control conditions (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) on colony number and volume are reported. ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with AZA-treated cells; wPo0.05, wwPo0.01 (ANOVA plus Bonferroni’s post-hoc) compared with ERLO-treated cells.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Control, Microscopy

Figure 7. Erlotinib potentiates the cytotoxicity of azacytidine by aggravating its intracellular accumulation. (a) SKM1 cells were incubated for 1 h with 10 nM [3H]-azacytidine ([3H]-AZA) alone (CTRL) or combined with 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO), 10 mM gefitinib (GEFI), 0.5 mM dasatinib (DASA), 50 mM verapamil (VERA, V), 1 mM cyclospor- ine A (CSA, C), 10 mM MK-571 (M) or 50 mM VERA þ 1 mM CSA þ 10 mM MK-571. Thereafter, cells were lysed and radioactivity measured in a liquid scintillation counter. Columns report intracellular [3H]- azacytidine levels (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) upon normalization to control conditions. #Po0.05, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Dunnett’s test) compared with [3H]-AZA-treated cells. (b) SKM1 cells were treated with 10 mM ERLO alone or combined with 1 mM azacytidine (AZA) for 1 h, then processed for the quantification of intracellular ERLO by mass spectrometry. Columns report intracellular ERLO levels (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ns ¼ non significant (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with ERLO-treated cells. (c) SKM1 cells were left untreated or treated with 1 mM AZA, 10 mM ERLO or 1 mM AZA þ 10 mM ERLO, alone or combined with 50 mM VERA þ 1 mM CSA þ 10 mM MK-571 for 48 h, followed by cytofluorometry for the assessment of apoptosis-associated variables upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. Black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PI þ) and dying (PI DiOC6(3)low) cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with AZA- treated cells.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Azacytidine and erlotinib exert synergistic effects against acute myeloid leukemia.

doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.469

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. Erlotinib potentiates the cytotoxicity of azacytidine by aggravating its intracellular accumulation. (a) SKM1 cells were incubated for 1 h with 10 nM [3H]-azacytidine ([3H]-AZA) alone (CTRL) or combined with 10 mM erlotinib (ERLO), 10 mM gefitinib (GEFI), 0.5 mM dasatinib (DASA), 50 mM verapamil (VERA, V), 1 mM cyclospor- ine A (CSA, C), 10 mM MK-571 (M) or 50 mM VERA þ 1 mM CSA þ 10 mM MK-571. Thereafter, cells were lysed and radioactivity measured in a liquid scintillation counter. Columns report intracellular [3H]- azacytidine levels (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3) upon normalization to control conditions. #Po0.05, ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Dunnett’s test) compared with [3H]-AZA-treated cells. (b) SKM1 cells were treated with 10 mM ERLO alone or combined with 1 mM azacytidine (AZA) for 1 h, then processed for the quantification of intracellular ERLO by mass spectrometry. Columns report intracellular ERLO levels (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ns ¼ non significant (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with ERLO-treated cells. (c) SKM1 cells were left untreated or treated with 1 mM AZA, 10 mM ERLO or 1 mM AZA þ 10 mM ERLO, alone or combined with 50 mM VERA þ 1 mM CSA þ 10 mM MK-571 for 48 h, followed by cytofluorometry for the assessment of apoptosis-associated variables upon co-staining with the Dcm-sensitive fluorochrome DiOC6(3) and the exclusion dye PI. Black and white columns illustrate the percentage of dead (PI þ) and dying (PI DiOC6(3)low) cells, respectively (means±s.e.m., n ¼ 3). ###Po0.001 (ANOVA plus Student’s t-test) compared with AZA- treated cells.

Article Snippet: The SKM1 cell line was a kind gift of Patrick Auberger (INSERM U895, Nice, France), while MOLM-13, KG-1, Kasumi-1, HL-60 and MV411 cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany).

Techniques: Incubation, Radioactivity, Control, Mass Spectrometry, Staining

B cells were harvested from the spleen of an Exosc10COIN/LacZ mouse and fixed and prepared for 3D-STORM after 72 hrs of treatment with (1) stimulation cocktail and (2) 4OHT+stimulation cocktail. Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-Aresolution) image from a data set of 50,000 frames with Atto488 labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus. Three dimensional views of the boxed region show spatial distribution of AID and Mtr4 molecules inside the nuclei of B cells isolated from (A) wild type cells and (D) Exosc10 knockout cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in the B cell nucleus of (B) wild type & (E) Exosc10 knockout cells and in the corresponding cytoplasms (C) & (F), by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (G) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nucleus versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 were calculated in the cytoplasm versus nucleus of (H) wild type & (I) Exosc10 knockout B cells using a Student’s t-test in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software and P values are noted in the graph. (J) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nuclear center versus displaced from center versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (K) Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-resolution) image with Alexa488 labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus of wild type Exosc10 cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in (L) nucleus center and (M) displaced from center of wild type cells, by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. All of the 3D STORM imaging was performed in three different B cells (from independent experiments) and repeated three or more times. 3D STORM super resolution image magnification is ×100. Scale bar: 1μm(K). Error bars indicate S.D. (P values: ** <0.01, *** <0.001)

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Nuclear Proximity of Mtr4 with RNA exosome restricts DNA mutational asymmetry

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.043

Figure Lengend Snippet: B cells were harvested from the spleen of an Exosc10COIN/LacZ mouse and fixed and prepared for 3D-STORM after 72 hrs of treatment with (1) stimulation cocktail and (2) 4OHT+stimulation cocktail. Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-Aresolution) image from a data set of 50,000 frames with Atto488 labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus. Three dimensional views of the boxed region show spatial distribution of AID and Mtr4 molecules inside the nuclei of B cells isolated from (A) wild type cells and (D) Exosc10 knockout cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in the B cell nucleus of (B) wild type & (E) Exosc10 knockout cells and in the corresponding cytoplasms (C) & (F), by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (G) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nucleus versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 were calculated in the cytoplasm versus nucleus of (H) wild type & (I) Exosc10 knockout B cells using a Student’s t-test in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software and P values are noted in the graph. (J) Comparison of the distribution of paired interaction of AID and Mtr4 in the nuclear center versus displaced from center versus cytoplasm by one way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) method in Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. (K) Reconstructed two color 3D STORM (super-resolution) image with Alexa488 labeled AID, AlexaFluor647 labeled Mtr4 and DAPI labeled nucleus of wild type Exosc10 cells. Histogram of the distribution of interactions of AID and Mtr4 calculated in (L) nucleus center and (M) displaced from center of wild type cells, by using Matlab (2014b, MathWorks) software. All of the 3D STORM imaging was performed in three different B cells (from independent experiments) and repeated three or more times. 3D STORM super resolution image magnification is ×100. Scale bar: 1μm(K). Error bars indicate S.D. (P values: ** <0.01, *** <0.001)

Article Snippet: Alexa488 (Against-Goat) , Jackson Immuno Research , 805-547-008.

Techniques: Labeling, Isolation, Knock-Out, Software, Comparison, Imaging

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Nuclear Proximity of Mtr4 with RNA exosome restricts DNA mutational asymmetry

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.043

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: Alexa488 (Against-Goat) , Jackson Immuno Research , 805-547-008.

Techniques: Magnetic Beads, Recombinant, Protease Inhibitor, Modification, Electron Microscopy, Shear, Transgenic Assay, Sequencing, Subcloning, Software

rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.

Journal: Journal of Virology

Article Title: Mumps Virus SH Protein Inhibits NF-κB Activation by Interacting with Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1, Interleukin-1 Receptor 1, and Toll-Like Receptor 3 Complexes

doi: 10.1128/JVI.01037-17

Figure Lengend Snippet: rMuV replication and SH protein expression. (A) Vero76 cells were infected with rMuV-SH, rMuV-SHstop, rMuV-SH-C, or rMuV-SHstop-C at an MOI of 0.01. Supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated in triplicate on Vero76 cells. The detection limit due to assay procedure is 102 (dashed line). The graph depicts means ± standard deviations (SD) from one representative experiment for which three independent infections were performed at the same time. A549 (B and D) and Vero76 (C and E) cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. Total SH protein (B and C) was detected using an APC-conjugated FLAG-specific antibody. The values of rMuV-SHstop or rMuV-SHstop-C were subtracted from the values of rMuV-SH or rMuV-SH-C. Total N protein (D and E) was detected using an N-specific primary antibody and an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. The values of mock-infected cells were subtracted from the values of rMuV-infected cells. Graphs depict means ± SD from three individual experiments. *, P < 0.05; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value. (F) A549 cells were infected with rMuVs at an MOI of 5 and harvested at 20 h postinfection. Cells were treated with 0.5% saponin (permeabilized) for intra- and extracellular SH detection or not treated (nonpermeabilized) for extracellular SH detection by flow cytometry. Staining and calculation for total SH protein were carried out as described for panels B and C. The graph depicts means ± SD from three individual experiments. ***, P < 0.001; results were calculated by unpaired t tests with a two-tailed P value.

Article Snippet: For detection of mumps NP protein, cells were additionally stained with goat Fab anti-mouse IgG (H+L)-Alexa Fluor 488 (no. 115-547-003; Dianova) for 15 min on ice.

Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test, Staining